The facelifted car’s new 72.6kWh long-range battery boosts the ZS EV’s range to up to 273 miles, around 110 miles more than the older car. MG’s Pilot system also brings an array of active safety systems, too. The ZS EV comes with 17-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, rear parking sensors, climate control, adaptive cruise control and integrated sat-nav with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity all fitted as standard. Once inside, you'll benefit from BMW's Live Cockpit Professional infotainment set-up which includes a 12.3-inch digital instrument display and a further touchscreen of the same size for controlling the media functions and sat nav – it's a brilliantly intuitive system. The X5 won our Large Premium SUV of the Year in 20, and while it has always demonstrated great flexibility in both five and seven-seat forms, it was the introduction of the supremely capable xDrive45e plug-in hybrid version which helped the X5 take the gong.Ĭapable of covering around 50 miles on battery power alone, the xDrive45e is able to reduce the usual running costs of a typical large SUV, while CO2 emissions starting from 27g/km mean the X5 will be more attractive to business users. Originally, BMW marketed the X5 as a Sports Activity Vehicle (SAV), but it has evolved to deliver luxury levels of comfort and refinement. Sources | Images: IIHS, via Jalopnik, Volvo Cars.BMW launched the first X5 in 1999, when its blend of style, practicality, and quality engineering immediately set it apart from the SUV competition. I’m “Volvo Jo,” however, so feel free to scroll on down to the comments section at the bottom of the page and tell me why I’m anti Tesla or something. Clearly they learned quite a bit about safety from their Swedish siblings, and didn’t forget in the intervening years.īack to Volvo, the latest IIHS test result continues a trend reinforces a “record” set in April of this year, when Volvo Cars achieved the highest possible rating from IIHS for every one of its models tested, including plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles. “To have our work validated by the experts at the IIHS in their newest test adds to the pride we take in our safety focus for every vehicle we produce.”Īs for Ford? The Blue Oval was Volvo’s parent company until it spun off the Swedish brand to China’s Geely group in 2010. “At Volvo Cars, we have always designed and built our cars to our own exacting safety standards based on our knowledge studying real world crashes,” said Thomas Broberg, acting head of the Volvo Cars Safety Center. Meanwhile, Volvo’s success - after nearly 100 years of advocating for improved vehicle safety - comes as no surprise. That should raise alarm bells, if only because the primary reason so many people buy these vehicles to begin with is that they have kids to haul around in the back seat. Instead, it’s that almost all of the 15 SUVs tested scored a “good” rating on the old, driver-only tests. The most disturbing thing about this list, I think, isn’t that vehicles like the Jeep Compass or Chevy Equinox earned “Poor” ratings here. The rest of the list, and their results, are included below: The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, was rated acceptable.” The new test is called updated moderate overlap test - and, of the 15 vehicles tested, only the Volvo XC40 and Ford Escape protected their back-seat passengers well enough to earn a “good” rating. The IIHS’ new test focused on the back seat using a dummy that represented a 12 year old child - and, as a result, they discovered just how un-safe many crossovers and SUVs really can be for kids and passengers! Who Did What In this case, the IIHS zeroed in on the fact that conventional crash testing usually only considers the safety of the driver, and uses “an average-size man” dummy, with no regard for rear passenger safety. That’s where independent testing bodies like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ( IIHS) come in, conducting more detailed crash tests of their own and finding out things that the “basic,” government-manded tests might miss. Vehicle safety is often cited as one of the most important elements of a new car buyer’s decision, but most people have no idea how limited government crash test data really is - or how easily that system could be gamed. And - of course! - the Volvo XC40 was one of them. In its first year conducting rear seat safety tests on 15 US-market SUVs and crossovers, only two scored a “good” safety rating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |